I honestly just feel like you could have phrased this better. It kinda reads like you are deciding when we are happy... :P

For

I'm curious as to what the word "chastised" means to you? To me it is not a very serious word at all, and I generally see it used to refer to flippant/fleeting punishment. :P

Agree with Sheep. I would remove the automatic designation following a declaration of war. Otherwise I support this.

Good stance. And what a sexy graphic seriously

At the very least, I do find it kinda odd that we maintain embassies with regions that have wronged us.

Quoting doesn't seem to be working for me... Anyway, aside from agreeing with Cormac on all points, I also can't vote for unless my previous concerns are answered, regarding what an activity requirement hopes to achieve.

Aye

Seems to be the Speaker's reasoning was that the author in a bill provided clear authority for who controlled that bill -- but surely we can just say that the thread OP is the one who has that authority? I don't think we need an author section in the bill at all.

I still don't see the point but I'm not against it. Like why move citizens into an inactive citizen category, if they can restore their citizenship automatically just by posting? What does that achieve? I don't really get the overall purpose of the activity requirement -- because the only...

Not sure that's necessary now. Seems we're moving over to a new thread now too. And my post at the top of this page was sorta a question -- why was the thread title edited and was that really necessary? This was a discussion thread, I never made an actual bill proposal.

I uh... I'm not sure this really required splitting into a new thread but ok. It's not a different proposal because the other thread didn't actually have a solid proposal, it was a discussion...

Pretty much everything about this situation annoys me a bit, especially the idea of Mr. J getting a badge.

I see the Speaker took the liberty of editing the title of this thread  :lol:

So people have to post in some silly spam topic every 27 days to keep citizenship? Rules like this do not produce activity. They are just tedious.

But that doesn't make sense sorry. If you say anything that isn't specifically allowed by the list, your vote is invalid. It's really quite simple yeah Where is the problem?

I don't feel particularly strongly about it. My aversion to them is likely due to me considering oaths as very serious things IRL and therefore finding them a bit inappropriate for an in game community.

My dumb brain kept reading that as three fifths

Now we see if it gets repealed lol

Can I say I dislike oaths. They are entirely useless.