I love the idea.
I would be wary with awards that are by post count, text length etc. Spamming threads with ideas that have already been discussed shouldn't be rewarded, nor should writing excessive essays to convey a simple point.
Perhaps the person who wrote the amendments including in the...
It literally is their choice and it literally is pragmatic according to section 2 of the proposed law:
Full support of the idea.
I am on board with adding a clause like Rogernomics said that allows the government to redact certain information, though as long as we provide an avenue to...
I still don’t see a full opinion posted, simply a guilty verdict & sentencing.
An opinion outlines why the court ruled a certain way. I don’t see that anywhere, unless I am missing something
2 questions:
A. What are your thoughts on the guilty verdict in McChimp v. Vedan? I do not see a detailed ruling, and I feel the guilty verdict is not just, especially without a full opinion posted.
B. What would you fundamentally change about the court?
No, I asked treadwellia for his thoughts and he failed to even acknowledge this thread… (though maybe it happened on discord? I am not aware of that if so)
I would disagree. Treadwellia & NR are the leaders of our region. If we have concerns, I believe it makes sense to bring it to them & for them to take responsibility.
I think Treadwellia would agree with my sentiment
Awesome, thank your for your thoughtful response.
Also good to hear discussions are going on in discord as I am not involved there!
I agree with you that removing these people will not solve the long term issue of inactivity
Reductio ad absurdum isn’t the most beneficial response in my eyes, but it seems so far most active members are against this. Is anyone even for this motion?
Can anyone outline their thoughts besides an empty “yes” or a ”no”?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.