Allowing any member of the delegacy to temporarily serve as a justice would destroy the separation of powers I would not be for anyone to serve on the court who has not been confirmed by the assembly

4.1.g: sounds too loosey goosey for me 5.1: can we make a clause that non citizens can appeal their own ban?

Your Name: Frankender The question is for: PM or IM The Question: What’s the plan with the Gazette? When’s the next issue getting posted?

I’m down

Not really, unless I’m mistaken here but… 1. It was a forum poll, not an actual vote, so it has no weight. 2. It was back in 2018 3. Only 4 people voted for that motto Re: https://nslazarus.com/forum/index.php?threads/1899/

& i like this idea for delegate day

against until the following is corrected/changed: section 1 title has a typo not a fan of 2.1 not a fan of 2.4 grammar in 3.1 is broken grammar in 3.1a is broken grammar in 3.1b is broken grammar in 3.2 is broken grammar in 4.1 is broken grammar in 4.2 is broken grammar in 4.3a is broken

This is perfect. All for this change!

I would disagree. As long as there is a Granting Official, it is their duty to advise the Delegate on citizenship applications

Did someone accidently move this to the voting area? For this proposal

Aye

I second the motion

Clorinda: Aye Deadeye Jack: Aye McChimp: Aye JoWhatup: Aye

No takers? Lol No objections here! Looks like a promising cabinet.

1. Domais

There is no written format anywhere, so Dom’s title formatting isn’t “correct” and Deadeye Jack’s isn’t “incorrect”

Ooo I didn’t know there was a format, where is it written?

Just noticed deadeye jack is for increasing our "anti-facist" opps. You want to increase regional guard opps to once per month. Is that via these "anti-facist" opps? If not, what type of activity do you prefer we engage in?

What makes you a better candidate than Domais?

What makes you a better candidate than Deadeye Jack?